#At2020 usb shock mount portable#

System preferences opened up and I selected the Yeti for input and output. I simply connected the mini USB and connected it up to my iMac. It is difficult to split the difference in quality of sound although the Yeti has four different recording settings depending on the sound source so just pips the AT2020.ДЄfter I got my blue Yeti, I was recording inside a minute of opening the box. The sound from both mics adds a deep richness to any voice and perfectly captures the warm tones of an acoustic guitar. The sound quality is wonderful with both the Yeti and the AT2020. If you want portability, the AT2020 wins every time The yeti is professional and robust while the AT2020 is svelte and lightweight. Also, you can easily find a shock-mount to fit the AT2020, so you get minimal background noise. The AT2020 from Audio Technica is a smaller unit thatвЂ™s a bit more costly but itвЂ™s a touch more versatile for road-warriors.

#At2020 usb shock mount portable#

It stable and sturdy however it cuts down on the portability so if you have to have an easily portable unit to cart around, the yeti mic probably isnвЂ™t your best option. ItвЂ™s massive size gives it a lot of weight which is perfect for desktop or studio use.

The Blue Yeti USB mic is the top-of-the-range offering from Blue microphones. Both are mid-priced mics, and both mics plug into the USB port and provide professional quality recording. The Yeti and the AT2020 occupy the sweet-spot in terms of price, quality, functionality and quality so deciding which is the best USB mic comes down to you personal preference and how you intend to use the mic.

The question I get asked more than anything else is whether to buy the Blue Yeti USB microphone versus the AT2020 from Audio Technica.